Sustainability
ESG Maturity Index
Environmental, social, and governance assessed across 6 dimensions and aligned with GRI, ISSB, ABNT PR 2030, and ISO 26000 — to move beyond talk and prove practice.
The problem it solves
Having a sustainability policy, a report, and a committee doesn’t mean being mature in ESG: an unaudited supply chain, nonexistent materiality, and unmapped climate risks are common gaps.
The problem is rarely a lack of intent — it’s the absence of an assessment. Without criteria, self-assessment becomes unintentional greenwashing; the assessment exposes where the real gaps are.
What it assesses
What the assessment evaluates
Each dimension is assessed in depth — no critical area is left out.
ESG Governance & Strategy
Clear strategy, assessed materiality, committed leadership, and real accountability.
Environmental & Climate Performance
Emissions (Scopes 1–3), energy, climate risks, water, waste, and circular economy.
People & Human Capital
Equity, diversity and inclusion, human rights, health and safety, and ethics channels.
Community & Social Impact
Community programs, community consultation, vulnerable groups, and alignment with the SDGs.
Value Chain & Responsible Sourcing
ESG criteria for suppliers, contractual clauses, audits, and due diligence.
Transparency, Reporting & Engagement
GRI/ISSB standards, transparency about impacts, independent assurance, and dialogue with stakeholders.
The scale
The 5 maturity levels
Each dimension and the organization as a whole are placed at a clear level — color, number, and name.
No structured practices: sporadic ESG actions, in response to requirements or incidents, with no policy, targets, or owners.
The organization recognizes ESG and structures initiatives, with first informal policies and one-off projects, without integration.
Formalized practices: documented policies, targets, active governance, and materiality guiding priorities.
ESG integrated into strategy: mapped climate risks, monitored supply chain, and externally verified reports.
ESG as a competitive advantage: science-aligned targets, reasonable assurance, human rights due diligence, and measured impact.
Calibrated, not generic
Provenance and calibration
The analysis carries the reasoning of the reference frameworks — that’s what separates a calibrated assessment from generic advice.
Want to go deeper? Understand the methodology, dimensions, and levels in detail in the technical guide.
Understand the model in depthSecure your founder access
Join by August 1, 2026 and get 6 months of Pro free — plus 6 more for active founders. No card.